
This week, I welcome back Donna Hazel, who previously shared with us the Tarot Birth Cards of the ‘rich and famous’. This time, Donna explores the angels in the Tarot cards, delving deep into their significance within the Tarot. I bet you will learn something you didn’t already know (I know I did!). Over to you Donna… There are six Tarot cards explicitly depicting angels. Specifically, they are in the Major Arcana and are Archangels, from the Greek archangelos or “Chief Messenger”. Although in our Tarot cards the angels have been represented according to typical early Christian art, in full regalia of gown and wings, this lack of subtlety was no doubt entirely deliberate – this is a message not to be missed! Even their wings expand through the borders of the cards with the suggestion of the unlimited, the infinite, of what is beyond the mundane and materially perceptible, or even just aspects of a situation you can’t perceive. Angels or divine messengers feature in most dominant world cultures and religions. In the West they can be traced back as far as Ancient Greece. Plato called them “daemons” (not to be confused with the Judeo-Christian “demons”) in The Symposium and described them as “intermediaries” between men and gods. In The Apology Socrates claims to have a daemonic “divine something”; a voice which would act as a warning (although it never told him what to do). There are many angels and Archangels but only the four mentioned in the Book of Enoch made it into the Tarot cards. These are Raphael, Gabriel, Uriel, and Michael. The most famous, dense and intense work on angels remains the Summa Theologica by Thomas Aquinas (c1225-1274). Here he discusses angelic substances and Grades, Orders and Hierarchies of angels, amongst many other angelic issues. It’s a tough read, but if you are interested in angels you will find this provides the backdrop for much of what we know about angels today.
What are Angels?
Spiritual beings or entities. There are two ongoing debates about the status of angels in the Bible. One concerns whether they are the departed spirits of men or whether they are inhuman divine beings created by God, who never were incarnated as human. The second and related controversy concerns whether we are ourselves essentially angelic. One can find “evidence” either way; however there do seem to be places where Jesus (and Lot) do indeed find themselves discoursing with what appear to be the dead. In Matthew (17:1:3) John, James and Peter behold Jesus conversing with the (dead) Moses and Elijah. It is unclear whether the dead men were angels or ghosts (or both). Whereas with the appearance of the Archangels, it appears that these were never human. Jesus also tells us that we are angels in Heaven (Matthew 22:30). This was one basis – along with ambiguous remarks such as the Kingdom of Heaven is Within – leading to the view that we are essentially angels ourselves, but “fallen” and unaware of it from our embodied and limited conceptual horizons. The notion of Ascension is accordingly that we are on a lesson to restore or regain the spiritual knowledge we once had. The idea here is that our essence or true nature is divine or spiritual (although the two terms are often conflated: what is spiritual is not necessarily divine). The idea of regaining lost knowledge predates Christianity and can be found in Plato’s theory of anamnesis or recollection. We once had Absolute Knowledge but, when incarnated or re-incarnated, we forgot it. The seat of Absolute Knowledge he called Forms, the perfect archetypes of everything we encounter here below. Plato’s Forms were in part an attempt to account for where we get the idea of perfection from when nothing earthly ever instantiates it. Much later, Descartes makes a similar move when he asks from where we have a notion of the Infinite as we cannot experience or even conceive of it. Answer: God put the idea in us. Plato did not have a notion of a benevolent and omnipotent God but he did consider that the “source” or reason [logos] for existence was the One Beyond Being [epekeina tes ousias], later elaborated upon by Plotinus. Although the appearance of angels as we know them today was a much later artistic addition, as purely spiritual entities, strictly speaking, they have no form. Frequently in the Bible they appear as men. In fact, they were pretty notorious for appearing in disguise, often as people. Raphael is one. Theoretically, then, they can take on any form. So, although the Archangels only appear explicitly in six cards, perhaps there is an implied presence in many of the other cards too.
Angels of the Tarot
Let’s turn to how the traditional aspects and attributions of Archangels might be illustrated and reflected in the meanings of our Tarot cards.
Raphael
[God’s Healing] in the Lovers card. Raphael is not mentioned in the Bible but he does appear in some of the Apocryphal (or “hidden”) books; specifically, the Deuterocanonical book of Tobit. In the Islamic Hadith he is called Israfil. In the book of Tobit he appears disguised as a travelling companion and restores the eyesight of Tobit. He also binds a demon named Azazel and saves Tobit’s daughter-in-law, Sarah, from another demon, Asmodeus (responsible for lust). Accordingly, Raphael is seen as the Healing Angel and the patron saint of the blind, the sick, the healing professions, lovers and travellers. He is also considered to drive away nightmares and often depicted as a young man holding a flask and/or a fish. Page of Cups anyone? The Lovers card in the Tarot clearly exemplifies the love aspect of Raphael’s patronage. However the card is also about his other modalities and can suggest travel, health and healing. It can also signify an important choice to be made or a temptation to be resisted (Asmodeus!) often putting the two together as a trial of love involving an important decision.
Gabriel
[Man of God] in the Temperance card. Gabriel is our biggest “messenger” angel in the Tarot. He appears a number of times in the Bible as a messenger of God to interpret dreams and visions, most notably those of Daniel in the Book of Ezekiel, the Virgin Mary to foretell the birth of Jesus (Luke 1:11) and to the Shepherds (Luke 2:9-14). It is also said that it was Gabriel who revealed the Koran to Muhammed. Gabriel is named in the New Testament (Luke 1:9-26). The only other angel to be named is Michael (Jude 1:9). Gabriel’s messages concerned the transformation of the spiritual into matter, or spiritually infused matter, and telling the future. They were about time, and timing, and the blending of the spiritual with the earthly. The Temperance card mirrors these messages and is about a sense of correct proportion and timing with combinations and mixtures. It is about patience, moderation, and harmony. The blending of different elements brings about a new creation. The card asks us to take a view best expressed by Spinoza: to view all things sub specie aeternitatis (in the context of eternity). In the vernacular, don’t sweat the small stuff!
Uriel
[Fire of God] in the Devil card. Uriel is a little ambiguous in that he is not to be equated with Lucifer [Light Bearer] or Satan [Adversary]. Uriel appears in the Book of Enoch (20:1-18). He often does good and is an Angel of Presence (allowed to enter the presence of God) but he is also seen as a firey and pitiless angel of the Earth and holds the key to the End of Time. In fact, the Catholic Church removed him from their list of angels suitable for veneration. The Devil card in the Tarot often depicts a Baphomet type Devil so it is with some ambiguity that he is identified as the angel Uriel. It could be his association with the keys to pit and as an angel of repentance. However, of course, angels can appear in disguise… The Devil card shows a tableau of enchainment or enslavement to earthly or material forms of desire. These could be external or self-imposed. It asks us to repent or release the attachments in order to free ourselves from limitations and oppression. The chains around the necks of the couple in the card are loose – they could lift them off if they really wanted. In that sense it is a card of hope. When the Devil shows up in a reading it may indicate a reluctance or refusal to leave an unhealthy situation of dependency. It can also suggest repressed fears. Occasionally it is an invitation to break loose, adopt a devil-may-care attitude and have some fun!
Michael
[Who is Like God] in the Judgement card. Over time Michael came to be regarded as the primary protecting and healing angel. In the Bible he was the Defender of God’s realm against Satan in the Book of Revelation. He is also the Angel of the Lord and the Angel of the Dead, carrying deceased souls to Heaven – which probably explains his presence in the Judgement card. He was seen to give each soul, at the hour of death, a chance to redeem itself before passing over. Sometimes he is shown weighing souls in a balancing scale – which also recalls the Justice card or even the Six of Pentacles. In the Egyptian Coptic Church he has a similar role in presenting the prayers of the just to God and in accompanying departed souls to Heaven. He might even be present in the High Priestess card – sometimes she is seen as Hathor, and Michael is celebrated in the month of Hathor. Some Tarotists assign Michael to the Temperance card and Gabriel to the Judgement card. This may be because Gabriel is frequently depicted blowing a trumpet; however, at various points all the Archangels are shown as blowing trumpets. In the Book of Revelation (8:6) seven angels are blowing or getting ready to blow trumpets. The association of Michael with the Judgement card may well have been influenced by van der Weyden’s famous painting of The Last Supper where Michael is beneath Christ, weighing souls, and at his feet the dead are rising up from their graves. Michael’s function of offering a redemptive choice is the main significance of the Judgement card. He is a metaphor for a rite of passage and important change. Some sort of transition or transfiguration is required which will result in rebirth, healing, and regeneration. The card announces that this is the time for a reawakening and renewal. Out with the old self and in with the new.
All four Archangels are in:
The
Wheel of Fortune The World Each angel can be seen in a corner of the cards. Raphael (Aquarius) is upper left, Gabriel (Scorpio) is the eagle, Michael (Leo) is the lion, and Uriel (Taurus) is the bull. But remember what was said about angels often appearing in disguise? How about the lion face in the Two of Cups? Sometimes angels are depicted as cherubs, as engraved into the throne of the Queen of Cups. Gabriel is also identified with the sephirot of Yesod – so perhaps he is present as the Tree of Life or Tree of Souls in the Ten of Pentacles? Or the Five of Pentacles? How might your readings be affected by seeing the pentacles as souls?! I counted at least thirteen cards altogether that have angels or the suggestion of angels. That disguise trick…how many might you see in your Tarot deck if you look with your angel spectacles on?
Finally…
Perhaps the most important combined message of our angel messengers is that they remind us of the importance of our spirituality and gently make it known in the cards that our lives are refracted through a spiritual prism coloured with unseen influences. So, too, we can be reminded that we are surrounded by healing, protecting and guiding invisible hands when we draw these cards. The angels in the Tarot figure as a powerful invocation of that unseen spiritual world shimmering through all of the Tarot cards. For more perspectives on angels in the Tarot: Cosmic Faery’s Tarot The Tarot School Tarot-ically Speaking Tarot Teachings Archangels and Angels
About Donna
I’ve always been attracted to the esoteric arts and acquired my first Tarot deck at the age of seventeen – although I didn’t know what to do with it at that time! Fascinated by why people think the way they do and with formations of the “self” and structures of identity, I went on to obtain a First Class BA in Literature and Philosophy, followed by an MA and a PhD in Philosophy. One of my interests concerned the notion of what is “exterior” to the confines of cognition, which converged with my twin interests in the Tarot and the sphere of the “para” normal. For me, the Tarot accesses a double domain of what is both “within” us and “without” us where we are both socially conditioned and inter-dependent beings, yet also beings hollowed out with a spiritual dimension: a value debased and almost lost in the modern Western world. Find me at www.tarotdontarot.blogspot.com. A new website will be announced in due course on the blog.
PSST... Do you want to create a personal and intuitive connection with each and every Tarot card and ultimately become a better Tarot reader?
The doors are now open to my signature program, TF1: Master the Tarot Card Meanings, and you're invited!
>> Click here to find out more about TF1 LIVE and reserve your place today!
P.S. Be quick! Doors close on Feb 8 and won't open again until at least 2016.












{ 35 comments… read them below or add one }
I really like this post about the Angels, my main Tarot clients prefer the Angel cards to regular decks, now I can interpret the other decks while incorporating the Angel explanations…and I love your posts from the Spanish Castle, I also thought that the 2 cards from last week were the High Priestess and the Hierophant………….How interesting to see and to relate back to the Tarot..
your friend in Tarot and life,
Susan
Hi Susan, glad you enjoyed it! It was very interesting doing the research for it and then working out how they mixed in with the significance of the Tarot. Yes, Angel cards are hugely popular right now! I’m glad it might help in explaining them in more depth.
Hi Susan,
Donna has done an amazing job with this post!
I’m so glad you’re enjoying the church/castle series, too. Once you open your eyes to the possibilities, you’ll see Tarot everywhere!
Brigit
Oh this was fun. I hadn’t really considered looking for hidden angels in the minors before…which is hilarious considering all the clues! DOH! Thanks for a wonderful article and opening my now spectacled eyes!
Thank you Wulfie. The ability of angels to disguise themselves has so many speculative ramifications!
Thank you for the great article! Archangel Michael is often depicted with a sword. So Justice comes to mind immediatelly. Also Ace of Swords. And a winged lion in the Two of Cups. Stone lions decorating the Queen of Wands throne. There is probably much more. Than you again.
Excellent, yes, you are quite right that Michael is often depicted wielding a sword. Maybe it’s a redemptive moment to all of the trouble&strife stuff of the Swords suit. I particularly love your spot of the Ace of Swords and Michael, as well as Justice. Fantastic. You’ve got your angel spotting spectacles on now. Yes, and lions on the base and the headrest of the Queen of Wands. Plus that little black cat, it’s yet another cat. Plus the Strength card big-time.
Oh, thank you! How did I miss The Strength? It’s a little bit weird to imagine Archangel Michael with his tail between his legs, but it makes the image so much stronger! And that black cat as a hidden Archangel at the feet of the Queen of Wands – wow!
Misspelling my own name in the reply!
Bless you. Michael as the lion in Strength recalls his function as protector and guardian of God’s realm. Which suggests that another significance of the lion in the Strength card could be that our instincts and impulses guard us in some way and shouldn’t be repressed, but befriended. Additionally, this recalls and adds Michael’s “healing” dimension to the Strength card. I guess the tail between the legs isn’t so much submission as an indication that the ferocity of our primal instincts and emotions are not a threat to us if we know how to incorporate them without obliterating them.
It is amazing, how your article and the insights are timely for me. I am going to paste a Buddhist story/Cherokee legend/one of many FB posts here:
“One evening an old Cherokee Indian told his grandson about a battle that goes on inside people. He said, ‘My son, the battle is between two ‘wolves’ inside us all. One is Evil. It is anger, envy, jealousy, sorrow, regret, greed, arrogance, self-pity, guilt, resentment, inferiority, lies, false pride, superiority, and ego.
The other is good. It is joy, peace, love, hope, serenity, humility, kindness, benevolence, empathy, generosity, truth, compassion and faith.’
The grandson thought about it for a minute and then asked his grandfather: ‘Which wolf wins?’
The old Cherokee simply replied, ‘The one you feed.”
A couple of days ago, after reading this story on-line for a thousands time, I had a dream. There was a starving child wearing very old and dirty clothes on the side of the road. I sat in the dust and just hugged the poor thing. It was very clear to me that that child was my ‘negative’ side and he needed as much love and, yes, food, as the side of me I am proud of and show off. Almost like having a ‘good’ son, who always sings and recites poems for your guests, and the OTHER one, which one prefers nobody to see.
I am not saying we should snap at people or be arrogant. But befriending that part of us, and actually loving it and showing it some tenderness is very important, I think. I totally disagree with the ‘wolves’ story.
Actually, one of the reasons I love Tarot – is because they have this ‘dark’ side to them. I also love that you called Archangels ‘ferocious’ in one your replies. So true.
Are we still talking about the lion in The Strength card?
Sorry for such a lengthy reply!
A new way to look at angles. I really enjoyed this read.
Thank you Karen. I didn’t know all that much myself before I did the research. The more I looked, the more involved and suggestive it became.
I truly enjoyed your article on Angels. It has inspired to me complete a task that I begun in my adolescence so long ago – finish reading Summa Theologica by Thomas Aquinas. (though I will probably have to start over at the beginning!) Thanks again!
Ah! The Summa Theologica. If it helps, Aquinas didn’t finish it either! It’s fascinating to see how much of what he said has crept into popular orthodoxy about angels though. People tend to imagine that it’s all in the Bible somewhere.
Hi Donna,
Your article on angels fascinated me, as I have never delved into that area, even though I have been reading the tarot for about 40 years. Now I will be looking at them more closely, as I can see where you are coming from with your interpretations. Thank you. Keep up the great work. Kathy
Thank you so much Kathy. It’s almost Biblical isn’t it? “Seek and ye shall find”. I starting seeing angels everywhere! And I had been reading the Tarot for a while too, without ever paying that much attention to the angels or how it all spreads out into the rest of the symbolism.
I really enjoyed your knowledge of angelic beings!! i will chec out ur website when u thru renovating
Glad you enjoyed it Katie. The renovated website is a little way off owing to other necessary projects on the horizon but feel free to follow the blog in the meantime and stay here with My Tarot Club as your number one Tarot resource!
This is lovely – we normally don’t associate the angels with Tarot – I like the way that tarot is being evolved by you and My Tarot Club into a much more powerful spiritual tool than just mere divination – great work!
Thank you Delfina. I agree that there is a whole spiritual dimension to the Tarot that we may not have fully registered without attention to the angels.
Hi! Donna, I have really updated my knowledge on Tarot and Angels with this post of yours, it is a very informative read, and I liked the associations, the analogy and the explanation and origins. Angels and Tarot I knew must have had some link, today it was reinforced with this post. Thanks for it and thanks to Brigit too for all the help always. Btw since I read the Angels are seen as the cherubs in the card too, I just had this query that I don’t see the cherub in one of the queens thrones in Tarot unlike the other three queen cards. What does it hint towards?
Hi Amit, yes they are somewhat ambiguous in the Queens. In the Queen of Swords, that could be the face of an angel or a cherub. In the Queen of Pentacles there is a face at the top and a figure at the bottom of the throne which are probably but not definitely cherubs, and in the Queen of Cups the cherubs have mermaid tails! And none obviously in the Queen of Wands – but there is our angelic association with the lions. In the Bible the seraphim and cherubim were not the cutesy creatures we might think of today but were ferocious guardians. Often with swords. Here’s a good overview of them:
http://www.whyangels.com/seraphim_cherubim_creatures.html#.UgJjQ23aKYg
Thank you very much Donna for the wonderful insight towards this unexplored area in Tarot. LYou indeed have detailed every bit and this shows how deep you have delved inTarot and how kind you are to share. God bless you. Anticipating more posts from you.
Thank you Amit, I’m so pleased everyone has enjoyed it so much.
Thank you so very much for posting this. It is extremely interesting and put in such a simple manner that even I can retain it!
Once again, thank you so much for all the effort you have put into this, it is very much appreciated.
Best wishes
Bobby
Thanks Bobby. Comments like yours and the others above make this all worthwhile. It was certainly no simple matter to negotiate the ambiguities in the Bible then transform the complexities into something accessible and reduce it down to the main points without, on the other hand, transforming it into a caricature! Thank you for realizing that and appreciating it. It was a work driven by sheer fascination and intrigue as, the more I discovered, the more gripping it became in relation to the Tarot.
Great post Donna.I have always believed in angels and have had a virtual proof of their existence.
Your post has beautifully articulated the significance of Angels in a Tarot reading complete with a historical and spiritual perspective. The readers would now understand better the guidance of angels in a reading. Angels are our virtual guides in this lifetime and we need to pick the subtle hints which the Universe sends us and be guided accordingly.They may appear in forms of gentle human beings who would help us to better our future.
Your site is very informative too.It really is amazing how you have managed to bring together your distinguished academic background alongwith Tarot for the benefit of humanity.Amazing !
One question on Devil card.Does it in any way reflect a “Negative” angel ? What is the significance of the Devil card vis a vis angels ? Also i find Two Of Cups in a way representative of an angel card.Would appreciate your views on this.
Regards,
Aasheesh
I agree, the Two of Cups is rather unexplored in many ways and would benefit from more investigation, especially given the size of that winged lion face. It isn’t subtle. As for the Devil card, I wouldn’t see it as a “Negative” card as such, nor in that sense a negative angel. Uriel is an angel of fire, and a guardian of the keys to the Pit – the connection between the fire of Hell and the Devil card is clear but he is not to be confused with anything Satanic. Uriel is not a “fallen” angel. In a way I think he’s trying to protect us in the Devil card. There’s this ambiguity where the fire of our passions and attachments could be negative, but it could also be positive – nothing is achieved without passion or even obsession. Either way it’s a kind of bondage but that’s not necessarily always negative. I would say the fire of desire is neutral in itself, the effect of what it’s applied to is what is at stake in the Devil card. It’s asking us to reflect on motivation and consequence. At worst, it’s a warning or reminder to check out our dependencies or compulsions just in case they are not beneficial. The card always makes me think of that old saying, “be careful of what you wish for in case you get it”.
Yelena – no, we were not talking about the lion in the Strength card alone, although that was one area of focus eliciting your remarks. Thank you for sharing the story, and I think your interpretation of your dream was spot-on, that dream was shouting at you! You’ll be all the stronger for looking after the “weaker” or more vulnerable part of yourself. It’s interesting, the oscillation between strength and weakness in the Strength card too, neither are victor or vanquished. They are Strength together. And OH YES, all the Archangels are ferociously strong and protective! They don’t take kindly to any sort of threat to their goodness or integrity – or yours. They are anything but sweet and passive. They can show you the way with great kindness (often in the guise of a helpful stranger) but they’ll fight without mercy to keep you from spiritual harm. In the Bible there are many mentions of how terrifying they are. Yes, I like that the Tarot has a “dark” side, as we do too, that Jungian “shadow” self, and all that’s repressed. I don’t think they could do such a great job at revealing our darker sides to us without the dance between light and dark in all the cards. Every card, even when upright, has a darker inflection. The Sun, for example, all that happiness, brightness, and joy. But the sun can also burn, scald, sear – it can be too much heat especially if it occupies a position along the lines of “what might be a problem?” The answer could well be burn-out if you get the Sun.
Thanks Donna for the detailed explanation.I love the last sentence “……….in case you get it “.
Donna,
Is an excellent tarot card reader, she was dead on with everything.
I’d like to thank Donna for her time, she’s fabulous!
Thanks again,
Sarah
Thank you so much too for taking the time to leave me a comment!
http://www.cosmictarot.co.uk/angels-in-tarot/
Your assignments of Archangels to Tarot Keys is not correct.
Hi James, yes I’m well aware that many swap Gabriel and Michael round depending on what “system” you ascribe to. However I don’t think there is any dogma everyone should universally accept. I still think Michael – Biblically if not via Enochian acolytes – fits with Judgement for the reasons I adduce in the article. I don’t think the Tarot should be hidebound by appeals to “tradition”. Indeed, I see nothing objectionable if readers wish to shuffle their own Angels into the cards – who’s to say what’s “right” and “wrong” with esoterica. Personally I’m not keen on lapidary assignations which are then proselytised as somehow immune from question.